Community sentencing

Community sentences in Scotland are most commonly delivered through Community Payback Orders (CPOs), which allow people who have committed offences to be punished in a way that also benefits the community and addresses the causes of their offending. Before a judge can usually impose a CPO, they must first receive a report from a criminal justice social worker. This report provides important background information about the individual, including their previous convictions, their likelihood of reoffending, their personal circumstances, their health, and what support they may need to change their behaviour. There are limited exceptions to this requirement, such as when the unpaid work or activity requirement is at the lowest level, between 20 and 100 hours, or when the order is imposed because a fine has not been paid.

Once a CPO is made, a criminal justice social worker employed by the local authority is responsible for supervising it. Their role is not only to monitor compliance but also to work with the individual to reduce future offending. In carrying out this role, the social worker may need to consult with a range of other organisations, including judges, Police Scotland, voluntary agencies, community councils and victim support groups. This reflects the idea that community sentences are not only about punishment but also about public protection and rehabilitation.

A Community Payback Order can include up to ten different requirements, and the judge decides which of these should be used in each case. The choice depends on the nature of the offence and on what measures are most likely to prevent further criminal behaviour. The most common requirement is unpaid work, which can range from 20 to 300 hours. This work is intended to benefit local communities and can include activities such as cleaning public spaces, redecorating community buildings, gardening in parks, helping in charity shops, or delivering furniture and goods to vulnerable people. Unpaid work may also involve activities designed to improve employability, such as learning new skills or receiving help with writing a curriculum vitae.

Another frequently used requirement is supervision. Under this condition, the person must attend regular meetings with a criminal justice social worker. These sessions focus on identifying the reasons behind their offending and helping them develop better decision-making skills. Supervision also allows the social worker to check whether the individual is complying with the rest of the order. In some cases, the court may include a compensation requirement, which obliges the person to pay money to their victim for injury, distress or damage to property.

Judges can also impose programme requirements, which involve attending structured courses arranged by social workers. These programmes are designed to tackle offending behaviour and often focus on issues such as substance misuse or anger management. A residence requirement may be used to ensure stability, for example by ordering the person to live at a particular address, such as with their parents. Conduct requirements allow the court to place specific restrictions on behaviour, such as prohibiting someone convicted of shoplifting from entering a particular shop. These are only used when the judge believes they will help prevent further offences.

In more serious cases, restricted movement requirements can be imposed. These may involve a curfew, requiring the person to remain at a certain address for up to twelve hours a day, or an exclusion condition that keeps them away from a specific place for up to twenty-four hours a day. Such restrictions can last for up to twelve months and are designed to reduce opportunities for further offending.

Three of the possible requirements focus on treatment for underlying problems linked to criminal behaviour: mental health, drugs and alcohol. If a person has a diagnosed mental health condition that contributes to their offending, they may be ordered to receive treatment such as counselling, clinic appointments or, in some cases, hospital care. Where drug misuse is a factor, the court can require attendance at clinics or hospitals to address addiction. Similarly, if alcohol misuse is connected to the offence, the person may be required to attend counselling or treatment services.

Overall, Community Payback Orders aim to balance punishment with rehabilitation. By combining practical consequences, such as unpaid work and restrictions, with support through supervision and treatment, CPOs seek to reduce reoffending while allowing individuals to remain in the community and make amends for the harm they have caused.

Source

Developing and Integrating Professional Resilience: Influencing Factors for Social Workers as Students and New Practitioners

The increasing complexity of social work practice presents significant challenges to practitioners, particularly those entering the profession as newly qualified social workers (NQSWs). These challenges affect workforce retention and overall well-being, necessitating a deeper understanding of professional resilience. A recent study conducted through longitudinal and qualitative research explored the factors that contribute to the development, maintenance, and integration of professional resilience among social workers. The study followed participants from their time as students in a Master of Social Work (Qualifying) (MSW(Q)) program through to their early experiences as professionals. The findings highlight the evolving nature of resilience, the critical role of relationships, and the disparities between academic preparation and workplace realities.

The social work profession demands engagement with marginalized and disadvantaged individuals, advocating for social justice and overcoming systemic barriers. However, research has shown that the challenging conditions of social work practice often lead to burnout, vicarious trauma, and compassion fatigue. Studies indicate that resilience plays a crucial role in mitigating these adverse effects, allowing social workers to adapt to their professional environments. While earlier research has largely focused on individual attributes such as emotional intelligence and personal coping mechanisms, recent inquiries emphasize the interplay between environmental factors and individual capacities in shaping resilience. This study adopts a strengths-based approach to understanding resilience as a dynamic and socially constructed process.

Research Aim and Methodology

The primary aim of this research was to explore social workers’ perceptions of the factors influencing their professional resilience during their transition from students to practitioners. Using a social constructionist and critical theoretical framework, the study employed a longitudinal qualitative design. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews conducted at two stages: the final year of the MSW(Q) program and approximately six months into professional practice. The research drew participants from eight Australian universities, employing narrative inquiry and thematic analysis to identify key themes related to resilience.

Ethical Considerations and Participant Recruitment

Ethical approval was obtained, and participation was voluntary, with informed consent secured at both interview stages. A total of 23 participants were recruited, with 19 continuing into the second stage. The study ensured anonymity by allowing participants to choose pseudonyms. Participants varied in age, cultural background, and educational experiences, providing a broad perspective on the factors influencing professional resilience.

Key Findings

Personal Adversity and Identity Formation

Many participants reflected on personal adversities, such as mental distress, domestic violence, and financial hardship, as formative experiences that contributed to their resilience. They described how these experiences enhanced their empathy, self-awareness, and ability to support others facing similar challenges. Many participants acknowledged that resilience developed over time through life experiences, reinforcing the notion that professional resilience is inherently linked to personal resilience.

Participants also noted the importance of self-awareness in maintaining resilience. As they transitioned into professional roles, they continued to encounter personal challenges, including difficulties securing employment, health diagnoses, and personal relationships. In these instances, they drew upon strategies they had previously developed, such as seeking support from peers, engaging in self-care, and accessing therapy. The participants’ narratives reinforced the idea that resilience is an ongoing process shaped by an individual’s ability to reflect on and learn from adversity.

The Role of Education in Professional Resilience

Social work education played a crucial role in facilitating self-discovery and strengthening professional resilience. Many participants described their academic journey as transformative, citing experiences such as critical reflection, engagement with peers, and interactions with faculty as instrumental in developing self-insight. Managing academic pressures, accessing university support services, and balancing multiple responsibilities also contributed to resilience.

Participants noted that field placements provided valuable opportunities to observe and model professional behavior, learn effective coping strategies, and engage in reflective practices. However, while they viewed education as a foundational component of their resilience, they anticipated and later experienced significant differences in workplace realities.

Supervision as a Protective Resource

Supervision emerged as a critical factor in developing professional identity and resilience. During field placements, participants generally found supervision to be a safe and supportive space for learning, self-reflection, and professional growth. However, as they transitioned into the workforce, many encountered challenges in accessing quality supervision. Some reported irregular or inadequate supervision due to workplace constraints, while others sought external supervision to compensate for workplace deficiencies.

The quality of supervision significantly influenced participants’ confidence and resilience. Those who received consistent and meaningful supervision described it as a protective resource, helping them navigate professional challenges. Conversely, those who lacked adequate supervision reported feeling unsupported, questioning their professional competence, and contemplating career changes.

The Impact of Workplace Support on Resilience

Participants highlighted the role of teams and management in shaping their resilience. During field placements, they observed workplace dynamics and learned from experienced professionals. Many noted that positive team environments fostered resilience by providing opportunities for collaboration, emotional support, and shared learning.

As practitioners, participants reported mixed experiences with workplace support. Those in supportive teams described a sense of belonging and access to valuable professional guidance. However, others encountered unsupportive environments where high workloads, lack of recognition, and limited managerial support negatively affected their resilience. Some participants responded by seeking support from external networks or considering job changes.

Discussion and Implications

The findings underscore that professional resilience is a multifaceted and evolving construct shaped by individual experiences, educational environments, and workplace conditions. The study reaffirms that resilience is not solely an individual trait but is socially constructed, emphasizing the importance of external support systems. These insights have significant implications for social work education, workplace policies, and professional development programs.

Universities and professional bodies play a vital role in preparing social work students for the realities of practice. Curriculum design should integrate opportunities for self-reflection, critical analysis, and discussions on navigating workplace challenges. Moreover, educators must equip students with the skills to advocate for their needs, recognize supportive workplace environments, and develop strategies for maintaining resilience beyond their academic journey.

Employing organizations must acknowledge the importance of supervision, team support, and managerial engagement in sustaining social workers’ resilience. Implementing structured induction programs, ensuring regular supervision, and fostering collaborative team cultures can enhance practitioners’ well-being and reduce attrition. In the UK, initiatives such as the Assessed and Supported Year in Employment (ASYE) offer a structured transition period for NQSWs, which could serve as a model for similar programs in other regions.

Limitations and Future Research

While this study provides valuable insights, it is limited by its sample size and geographic focus on Australia. Future research could explore cross-cultural perspectives on professional resilience and examine the long-term impact of workplace interventions. Additionally, further studies should investigate how different educational institutions and employment settings shape social workers’ resilience trajectories.

Conclusion

Professional resilience in social work is a dynamic and contextually influenced quality that develops over time. Social work students and practitioners benefit from supportive educational environments, meaningful supervision, and workplace structures that foster resilience. Universities, professional organizations, and employers share the responsibility of ensuring that social workers are equipped with the resources necessary to sustain their well-being and effectiveness in practice. By acknowledging the systemic and relational nature of resilience, the profession can move towards creating sustainable conditions that enable social workers to thrive.

Source