Understanding and Supporting PDA: A Nervous System Perspective

Pathological Demand Avoidance, also known as Pervasive Drive for Autonomy, is a profile most commonly associated with autism and, in some cases, ADHD or other neurodevelopmental conditions. First described in the United Kingdom in the 1980s, PDA has received growing attention in North America in recent years. Although it is not currently recognized as a standalone diagnosis in major classification systems, many individuals and families experience it as a distinct and meaningful pattern of needs and responses. PDA is often misunderstood or misidentified, particularly because individuals may appear sociable, articulate, and capable while internally experiencing extreme stress around everyday expectations.

At the heart of PDA is a high level of anxiety and an intense need for control over one’s own actions. People with a PDA profile experience ordinary demands as overwhelming, including things they may want or enjoy doing. These demands can involve daily tasks such as eating, sleeping, dressing, and attending school or work, as well as social expectations or internal bodily needs. Avoidance is not a deliberate choice or a form of manipulation; rather, it is a stress response driven by a nervous system that perceives loss of autonomy as a threat.

Demands for someone with PDA are not limited to direct instructions. They also include casual suggestions, expectations based on routines or social roles, praise that creates pressure to perform again, internal sensations such as hunger or illness, and even self-imposed goals. Because these demands accumulate, a person’s capacity to cope can fluctuate widely. What seems manageable one day may feel impossible the next. This helps explain why behavior can appear inconsistent across settings or situations.

PDA can be understood as a nervous system difference. Individuals with this profile tend to have heightened sensitivity to perceived threat, particularly when their freedom to choose is limited. When this happens, their bodies may enter a fight, flight, freeze, or fawn response. These reactions can look like arguing, refusing, running away, shutting down, becoming overly controlling or submissive, lying, joking compulsively, forgetting, fainting, or escaping into fantasy. These responses are not planned strategies but automatic attempts to regain safety and control. In this framework, behavior is a form of communication about stress and unmet needs.

Traditional behavior-based approaches often fail for people with PDA because they increase pressure and reduce autonomy. Systems based on rewards, consequences, or rigid routines tend to make anxiety worse rather than better. From the perspective of the person with PDA, such strategies feel like coercion, even when they are well intentioned. Avoiding demands is therefore a matter of being unable to comply, not refusing to do so. Many individuals mask their distress in certain environments, especially at school or in clinical settings, which can lead professionals to underestimate their support needs.

Effective support focuses on relationship, trust, and collaboration rather than control. Individuals with PDA are more likely to engage when they feel respected and when their autonomy is protected. Indirect language, shared decision-making, humor, and flexibility can reduce the sense of threat associated with demands. Explaining the deeper reasons behind requests can help them make sense of what is being asked and why. Emotional co-regulation is also essential, as PDA individuals are highly sensitive to the emotional states of others. When adults remain calm and regulated, it becomes easier for the individual to do the same.

It is equally important to recognize what does not help. Punishment, lectures, shaming, and rigid enforcement of rules tend to escalate distress rather than resolve it. Challenging behavior should be understood as a signal that something is wrong, not as the problem itself. Support requires weighing whether a task is truly worth the emotional and physiological cost for the individual at that moment.

Many people come to understand PDA during a period of burnout, which occurs when prolonged stress leads to a significant loss of coping capacity. Burnout is often marked by increased avoidance, intense mood swings, heightened anxiety, withdrawal from social interaction, and intolerance of previously manageable demands. Recovery from burnout requires very low levels of demand, extended time to rest and feel safe, and a slow, pressure-free return to activities. It also requires that others in the person’s life understand what burnout is and how to avoid pushing too hard, too soon.

In conclusion, PDA challenges conventional ideas about motivation and discipline. Instead of focusing on how to make someone comply, support involves asking how to help them feel safe enough to participate. Maintaining emotional calm, resisting punitive instincts, and prioritizing connection are essential. People with PDA cannot regulate their emotions if those around them are dysregulated. With understanding and the right environment, individuals with PDA can be imaginative, empathetic, spontaneous, and deeply insightful. When their nervous systems are supported rather than threatened, they are far more able to engage with the world in meaningful ways.

Medical Cannabis in the United Kingdom: From Principle to Practice

The introduction of medical cannabis in the United Kingdom in November 2018 marked a significant milestone in the long and contentious history of cannabis policy. After decades of prohibition, cannabis was reclassified to allow its use for medicinal purposes, creating widespread public optimism that patients would finally gain access to this long-debated therapy. However, two years after legalization, the reality fell far short of expectations. Despite growing evidence of therapeutic potential and high public demand, only a handful of prescriptions had been issued by the National Health Service (NHS), leaving patients frustrated and many forced to seek cannabis from illicit sources. The article “Medical Cannabis in the UK: From Principle to Practice” by Schlag et al. (2020) explores this disparity between principle and practice, analysing the scientific evidence, ethical challenges, regulatory barriers, and potential future directions for medical cannabis in the UK. This essay critically examines these dimensions, highlighting the tension between patient need, scientific uncertainty, and institutional caution that continues to shape the medical cannabis debate.

At the heart of the issue lies the historical and political trajectory of cannabis itself. Once regarded as one of the world’s oldest medicines, cannabis was criminalised in the mid-twentieth century largely for political reasons rather than empirical evidence of harm. Its reintroduction as a medicinal substance, therefore, represents a partial correction of that political error. Yet, as Schlag et al. observe, the move from prohibition to prescription has been hampered by a lack of clinical evidence stemming from its former classification as a Schedule 1 drug. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines currently sanction only three cannabis-based medicinal products (CBMPs): Sativex for multiple sclerosis spasticity, Nabilone for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, and Epidyolex for severe, treatment-resistant epilepsy. For patients suffering from chronic pain, anxiety, or other debilitating conditions, this narrow scope of approved treatments is profoundly disappointing, especially when many report significant benefits from unlicensed or illicit cannabis use. The mismatch between clinical caution and patient experience reveals a deeper tension between traditional evidence-based medicine and the growing field of patient-reported outcomes.

Scientific research on medical cannabis remains in an early stage. The 2017 report by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) summarised that substantial evidence supports cannabis’s efficacy in treating chronic pain, chemotherapy-induced nausea, and multiple sclerosis spasticity. Moderate evidence exists for improving sleep outcomes, while only limited evidence supports its use for conditions like anxiety, Tourette’s syndrome, or post-traumatic stress disorder. Schlag et al. highlight that the lack of large-scale randomised controlled trials (RCTs) has constrained acceptance by regulators and physicians alike. Yet, the absence of such data is itself a consequence of cannabis’s legal status, which for decades restricted research access. The authors argue that while RCTs remain the gold standard for clinical evidence, other forms of evidence — such as observational studies and patient-reported data — must also be valued. Indeed, real-world evidence from countries such as Canada and Germany demonstrates widespread patient satisfaction and quality-of-life improvements associated with medical cannabis. Studies have reported reductions in pain, anxiety, and opioid use, suggesting that cannabis may offer a safer alternative or adjunct to existing therapies. However, these findings remain controversial, as critics question the reliability of self-reported outcomes and warn against overgeneralisation.

Despite growing international support for medical cannabis, the UK faces unique barriers to implementation. One of the most prominent issues is the lack of physician education. Most British doctors have received no formal training in prescribing cannabis-based medicines, leading to uncertainty about dosages, formulations, and potential interactions. Schlag et al. cite initiatives such as the Academy of Medical Cannabis and Drug Science’s MyMedic platform as important steps toward filling this knowledge gap. Nevertheless, the inertia within medical education remains a key bottleneck. The reluctance of doctors is compounded by restrictive clinical guidelines that position cannabis as a last-resort treatment, permissible only when conventional medicines have failed. These guidelines, produced by authoritative bodies such as the Royal College of Physicians and the British Paediatric Neurology Association, create an environment of medical conservatism that discourages experimentation and innovation.

Another significant obstacle is the fear of adverse psychological effects, particularly psychosis and dependency. Public discourse around cannabis has long been dominated by the association between high-potency cannabis and mental illness, largely based on studies of recreational use. However, Schlag et al. argue that these concerns are often exaggerated or misapplied to medical contexts. The psychosis risk is primarily linked to high-THC, low-CBD street cannabis, whereas regulated medical formulations contain balanced cannabinoid profiles designed to mitigate such risks. Furthermore, data from Health Canada and other countries indicate a low incidence of dependence among medical users. Nonetheless, the perception of cannabis as a dangerous drug continues to influence prescribing behaviour, creating an implicit bias against its medical application. Overcoming this stigma requires not only education but also robust regulatory oversight to ensure product safety, dosage consistency, and responsible use.

Economic factors further complicate access. Because most NHS doctors refuse to prescribe cannabis, patients must rely on private clinics, where treatment can cost up to £40,000 per year. These prohibitive expenses reflect both import restrictions and the lack of domestic production infrastructure. Until recently, UK regulations required individual import licenses for each patient, causing delays and increasing costs. Although new provisions for bulk importation were introduced in 2020, the system remains inefficient compared to other European countries such as the Netherlands or Germany. Schlag et al. suggest that the high cost of medical cannabis is paradoxical, given that it has the potential to reduce healthcare expenditure by lowering reliance on opioids, benzodiazepines, and other costly medications. A comprehensive cost-benefit analysis might reveal that broader access to cannabis could be not only therapeutically beneficial but also economically rational.

Beyond logistical and economic barriers, the article raises fundamental ethical questions. The authors emphasise that the rigid insistence on RCT evidence as the sole criterion for legitimacy may inadvertently harm patients who have exhausted conventional treatments. In such cases, patient autonomy and the principle of informed choice become ethically significant. Denying access to potentially beneficial treatments due to bureaucratic inertia or evidentiary conservatism can be viewed as a moral failure of the healthcare system. Schlag et al. argue that while clinicians must act cautiously, they also have an ethical duty to balance potential harms against the immediate suffering of patients. The reclassification of cannabis as a Schedule 2 substance implies legal recognition of its medical potential; therefore, withholding it on procedural grounds risks undermining public trust in the healthcare system. Moreover, when patients turn to illicit markets due to lack of access, they expose themselves to unregulated and potentially harmful products, highlighting the urgent need for a controlled but compassionate prescribing framework.

The authors propose several strategies for reconciling these competing imperatives. Education and monitoring are at the forefront of their recommendations. By collecting systematic data on prescriptions, patient outcomes, and adverse effects, regulators can bridge the gap between clinical trials and real-world practice. Initiatives such as Drug Science’s Project Twenty21 aim to create Europe’s largest medical cannabis registry, offering valuable insights into usage patterns and efficacy. Such registries could serve as dynamic feedback systems, allowing doctors to make evidence-informed decisions even in the absence of traditional RCTs. Schlag et al. also advocate for developing a hierarchy of evidence specific to cannabis-based medicines, recognising that their diversity of formulations and effects defies simple categorisation. The authors note that cannabis should not be treated as a single drug but rather as a family of compounds with complex pharmacological interactions, requiring a more nuanced approach to research and policy.

Communication with the public is another crucial component. The 2018 rescheduling generated widespread misunderstanding, with many patients assuming that cannabis would become readily available through the NHS. The resulting disappointment has eroded confidence in both the government and the medical establishment. Schlag et al. call for clearer, more transparent communication strategies that explain what medical cannabis can and cannot do. Overhyping its benefits risks creating false hope, while excessive caution perpetuates stigma and frustration. An informed public dialogue, grounded in scientific honesty and empathy for patient experience, is essential for building a sustainable framework.

In conclusion, Schlag et al.’s analysis reveals that the legalisation of medical cannabis in the UK has so far been more symbolic than substantive. While the rescheduling from Schedule 1 to Schedule 2 was a necessary first step, systemic barriers have prevented meaningful patient access. The article makes a compelling case for reform on multiple fronts: expanding the evidence base beyond RCTs, improving physician education, reducing economic barriers, and developing ethical and regulatory frameworks that prioritise patient welfare. The central message is that progress requires balance — between caution and compassion, between evidence and experience, between science and social justice. Cannabis is not a miracle cure, but neither should it be dismissed as a dangerous relic of counterculture. As the authors conclude, medical cannabis policy must evolve in a safe, ethical, and evidence-informed manner, ensuring that those who could genuinely benefit are no longer left behind. The challenge for the UK is not whether to allow medical cannabis, but how to implement it responsibly — transforming principle into practice and rhetoric into care.

Source

The Good Lives Model: A Strengths-Based Approach to Rehabilitation

The Good Lives Model (GLM) represents a positive and strengths-based approach to offender rehabilitation. Developed by Tony Ward in 2010, it focuses on promoting personal fulfilment, well-being, and the pursuit of meaningful life goals rather than solely addressing risk factors or deficits. While it differs in emphasis from the traditional Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) framework, the GLM complements risk management by providing a more holistic, person-centred and engaging structure for rehabilitation (Ward & Fortune, 2013).

At the core of the GLM lies the belief that all individuals strive to achieve certain “primary human goods.” These are fundamental needs and aspirations that contribute to psychological well-being, such as life, knowledge, creativity, pleasure, spirituality, friendship, community, inner peace, excellence in work and play, and excellence in agency or autonomy. People pursue these goods through “secondary goods,” which are the specific activities or means used to achieve them. For example, running might be a secondary good that satisfies the primary good of excellence in play. However, when individuals lack the internal skills or external resources to pursue these goods in healthy and pro-social ways, they may resort to harmful or illegal behaviours. A person might, for instance, engage in harmful sexual behaviour as a misguided attempt to meet needs for intimacy or inner peace (Willis, Yates, Gannon & Ward, 2012).

The GLM views intervention as a process that helps individuals build the skills, strengths, and supports necessary to pursue their goals without harming others. Practitioners work collaboratively with clients to explore their values, aspirations, and personal definitions of a “good life.” Together, they develop a Good Lives Plan, identifying alternative and socially acceptable ways to meet primary goods while addressing risk factors that could hinder success (Purvis, Ward & Willis, 2011). This approach aims to replace harmful behaviours with positive strategies that allow individuals to live meaningful, fulfilling lives that do not cause harm to others.

Although originally developed for adults who had engaged in sexual offending, the GLM has been successfully adapted for use with children and young people by G-MAP, a UK-based service. This adaptation, known as the GLM-A, simplifies the model’s language and concepts to make them accessible and relevant to younger audiences. In this version, “primary goods” are referred to as “my needs,” while secondary goods are described as “how I meet my needs.” The eleven adult-focused primary goods have been condensed into eight primary needs that are more suitable for young people: having fun, achieving, being one’s own person, having people in one’s life, having purpose and making a difference, emotional health, sexual health, and physical health.

The GLM-A provides a framework for understanding the needs that drive a young person’s behaviour and informs the interventions required to help them meet these needs in appropriate ways. Interventions are carried out collaboratively, involving the young person and their family or carers, and recognising the importance of the wider social and systemic context (Fortune, Ward & Print, 2014).

In Scotland, the G-MAP model has been implemented through the Safer Lives Programme, introduced in 2008. This programme trains practitioners to use the GLM-A as part of their therapeutic work with young people who display harmful sexual behaviour. Initial evaluations of the GLM-A have been highly positive (Leeson & Adshead, 2013). Practitioners reported that the model improved their understanding of young people’s behaviours, enhanced engagement with children and carers, and provided a motivational and hopeful framework for change. Young people themselves found the model easy to understand and empowering, as it helped them recognise why they acted as they did and what steps they could take to change.

Further research into the implementation of Safer Lives in Scotland (Simpson & Vaswani, 2015) found that practitioners viewed the GLM-A as enriching their practice, sometimes by adding useful tools, and at other times by transforming their overall approach. They appreciated the model’s alignment with person-centred and strengths-based values and welcomed its shift away from a purely risk-focused perspective toward one that fosters growth and rehabilitation.

Despite its strengths, some critics have argued that the GLM focuses too narrowly on individual change and does not give enough attention to the social contexts that influence offending behaviour. McNeill and Weaver (2010) suggest that building social capital—such as supportive relationships, community involvement, and legitimate opportunities for participation—is essential to long-term desistance from offending.

Although the GLM and GLM-A have been applied primarily to individuals engaging in harmful sexual behaviour, the principles are equally relevant to other forms of offending. By focusing on personal growth, well-being, and the pursuit of pro-social goals, the GLM offers a promising framework for a wide range of rehabilitative practices.

In conclusion, the Good Lives Model and its adaptation for young people mark an important shift in offender rehabilitation, moving from a focus on risk and deficit toward one of growth, meaning, and human potential. By understanding and addressing the underlying needs that drive behaviour, the GLM empowers individuals to build better lives for themselves and safer communities for others.

Source

Neuroplasticity, emotional affect and regulation

Neuroplasticity

Neuroplasticity refers to the brain’s ability to reorganize itself by forming new neural connections throughout life. This process is crucial for learning, memory, and recovery from brain injuries. Andrew Huberman emphasizes that neuroplasticity enables the brain to adapt to experiences, which is foundational for skill acquisition and rehabilitation.

Key processes involved in neuroplasticity include:

Long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD): These are mechanisms that strengthen or weaken synapses based on activity levels. LTP increases the efficiency of synaptic transmission, while LTD decreases synaptic strength.
Experience-dependent plasticity: Changes in the brain due to experiences, such as learning a musical instrument or mastering a new language.
Experience-expectant plasticity: Refers to the brain’s ability to adapt based on expected sensory experiences, which is especially critical during developmental stages.

Emotional Affect

Emotional affect pertains to the experience and expression of emotions. It plays a pivotal role in shaping our responses to various stimuli, influencing our motivation, behavior, and overall mental health. Emotional regulation, or how we manage our emotions, is integral to maintaining emotional balance and well-being.

Key points regarding emotional affect include:

Impact of emotions on behavior: Emotions can significantly influence decision-making and interpersonal relationships. High emotional states may impair rational thought, while effectively regulated emotions can enhance performance and social interactions.
The role of neuroplasticity in emotional regulation: Learning to regulate emotions can lead to lasting changes in brain structure and function, enhancing an individual’s ability to cope with stress and adversity.
discusses how mindfulness and cognitive behavioral strategies can trigger neuroplastic changes that reinforce positive emotional responses.

Emotional Regulation

Emotional regulation involves strategies to influence which emotions we have, when we have them, and how we experience and express them. Effective emotional regulation is linked to better mental health outcomes and the ability to handle stress.

Techniques for emotional regulation include:

Cognitive reappraisal: Changing the way we think about a situation to alter its emotional impact. This technique promotes emotional resilience by fostering a positive outlook.
Mindfulness practices: Engaging in mindfulness and meditation can enhance awareness of emotional states, promote acceptance, and reduce automatic responses to emotional stimuli.
Physical activities: Exercise can serve as a powerful tool for emotional regulation, improving mood and reducing stress by releasing endorphins and other beneficial neurochemicals.

The importance of social connections and support systems in emotional regulation. Relationships provide a buffer against stress and contribute to emotional resilience.

Integration of Concepts

Understanding how neuroplasticity interacts with emotional affect and regulation is crucial for personal development and psychological well-being. Research shows that:

Engaging in activities that promote learning and emotional regulation can lead to structural brain changes that enhance resilience.
Chronic stress can negatively affect neuroplasticity, leading to issues like anxiety and depression, while positive experiences can promote adaptive changes in the brain.

Introduction to “Self” and “Use of Self” in Social Work

The concept of “self” is essential in social work practice. Yet, there is no universal agreement on what “self” means, leading to challenges in applying and teaching “use of self.” This term refers to the ways social workers use their personalities, insights, and emotional responses to engage with clients. The article seeks to define “self” within a theoretical framework that social workers can rely on for effective practice.

Theories of “Self” in Developmental Psychology

Trevithick delves into infant psychological development to explain how a sense of self emerges. The theories examined include:

Bowlby’s Attachment Theory: Describes “internal working models” formed in early caregiver relationships, shaping individuals’ future attachments and self-perceptions.
Feminist Perspectives on Gendered Self: Feminist theories argue that identity formation is influenced by societal roles, often creating distinct gendered expectations and identities for boys and girls.
Psycho-Social Development Models: Several models (e.g., Erikson’s stages of psycho-social development, Piaget’s cognitive development stages) view human development as a series of stages shaped by relationships and experiences, each contributing to self-identity.

Core Concepts of Self

The “self” can be described with various characteristics:

Core vs. Adaptive Self: The “core self” is a stable inner identity, while the “adaptive self” reflects how individuals adjust to different contexts.
Public and Private Self: Some aspects of “self” are public (how one behaves socially), while others are private, more intimate, and inner-directed.
True and False Self: Introduced by Winnicott, the “true self” represents one’s authentic nature, while the “false self” is a defensive response to protect the “true self” in adverse environments.

Bowlby’s Internal Working Models

These models are mental frameworks developed from early experiences that guide expectations in future relationships. For social workers, understanding their own internal working models, as well as those of clients, helps create more supportive interactions.

Non-Verbal Communication in Social Work

The article highlights the importance of non-verbal cues in social work, which often reveal underlying emotions and states. Practitioners should be adept at reading body language, tone, and expressions to understand clients better. This skill enhances the “use of self” by allowing social workers to respond empathetically and intuitively.

Self-Awareness and Reflexivity

Self-awareness is fundamental in the “use of self,” enabling practitioners to recognize their reactions, biases, and emotions. This awareness aids social workers in maintaining objectivity and empathy, vital for effective client interactions. Trevithick emphasizes that self-awareness should be continuously cultivated through reflection, emotional honesty, and a “curious exploration of self.”

Developing a Coherent Framework for “Use of Self”

Trevithick proposes a theoretical framework linking three elements:

Internal Working Models: Practitioners should recognize how these models influence their reactions and interactions.
Communication Theory: Understanding non-verbal cues enriches the relational dynamics of social work.
Self-Awareness: Reflecting on one’s behavior, beliefs, and emotions is key to developing a responsive and ethical practice.

Conclusion

The article emphasizes that to apply “use of self” effectively, social workers need a coherent framework grounded in psychological theories, communication skills, and self-awareness. This approach fosters genuine connections and therapeutic relationships in social work, highlighting the profession’s relational essence and commitment to client-centered care.

Source

Strengths-Based Approaches in Social Work

Strengths-based approaches (SBAs) in social work represent a significant shift from traditional models that often focus on deficits and needs. Instead, SBAs prioritize the inherent strengths, assets, and capacities of individuals, families, and communities. This philosophical and practical approach encourages empowerment, resilience, and co-production, aiming to improve well-being and foster independence. Emerging prominently after the implementation of the Care Act 2014 in England, SBAs have become a central framework for adult social care, emphasizing personal well-being and outcomes-focused practices. This article explores the theoretical foundations, implementation strategies, challenges, and impacts of SBAs, drawing on findings from a comprehensive study conducted between 2020 and 2021.

The theoretical underpinning of SBAs lies in a salutogenic perspective, which prioritizes health and capacity over pathology and deficiency. Saleebey’s seminal work in 2009 emphasized focusing on the strengths and resources available to individuals rather than their problems. This approach aligns with the values of self-determination and human resilience, urging practitioners to view individuals as active agents capable of participating in their own care. Central to this perspective is the belief that by identifying and leveraging existing strengths—whether within individuals, their communities, or their broader networks—greater autonomy, independence, and long-term well-being can be achieved.

In practice, SBAs have been embraced by many local authorities in England as part of their adult social care strategies. The study referenced here used a two-stage design to understand how SBAs are being implemented and what outcomes they generate. The first stage involved an online survey completed by 32 social care practitioners, including social workers, managers, and commissioners. The second stage comprised in-depth interviews with ten participants from the survey cohort, allowing for nuanced insights into the practical application of SBAs.

Implementation of SBAs varied widely across different settings, from mental health services to safeguarding teams and community-led support initiatives. Many practitioners employed specific models, such as the “Three Conversations” approach, which focuses on listening, intensive work, and building a better life for service users. However, most respondents reported adapting these models to fit their local context, creating hybrid frameworks tailored to organizational needs and individual circumstances. For some, SBAs were not confined to a specific method or toolkit but represented an overarching ethos influencing all aspects of practice, from policy formulation to frontline interactions.

Training played a vital role in the adoption of SBAs, equipping practitioners with the skills and knowledge required to integrate these principles into their work. While many participants expressed satisfaction with the training they received, others noted that it often reiterated existing practices rather than introducing genuinely innovative concepts. This reflects a broader challenge in conceptualizing SBAs, as many practitioners felt they were already applying similar principles under other frameworks, such as person-centered or personalized care. The lack of a clear, distinctive definition of SBAs sometimes led to confusion about their unique contributions to social work.

The impact of SBAs on service users has been overwhelmingly positive, fostering a sense of control, engagement, and hope. By emphasizing strengths rather than deficiencies, SBAs help individuals feel valued and empowered, encouraging active participation in managing their own care. For many, this approach has led to improved well-being, greater trust in social care services, and enhanced independence. Community-level benefits have also been observed, with stronger relationships, better support for carers, and increased utilization of local resources contributing to a more holistic care environment.

Social care practitioners themselves reported significant benefits from adopting SBAs. Many felt a renewed sense of purpose and professional identity, as the approach allowed them to move beyond procedural tasks and focus on meaningful, person-centered interactions. This shift not only improved their job satisfaction but also fostered creativity and autonomy, enabling them to explore innovative solutions to complex problems. However, these positive outcomes were not universal. Some practitioners experienced increased anxiety due to the heightened responsibility and autonomy required by SBAs, particularly when operating in resource-constrained environments. The lack of sufficient managerial support or reassurance compounded these challenges, underscoring the need for robust organizational structures to support SBA implementation.

Organizational processes have also been significantly influenced by SBAs, with many local authorities streamlining bureaucratic systems to align with the ethos of the approach. Simplified assessment forms, reduced paperwork, and more efficient triaging systems have not only saved time but also improved the quality of interactions between practitioners and service users. For example, shifting the focus from procedural compliance to meaningful conversations has enhanced the immediacy and relevance of care provided at the first point of contact. Nevertheless, these systemic changes often required significant restructuring and resource investment, posing challenges for organizations operating under financial constraints.

Despite the many benefits of SBAs, their implementation is not without challenges. Resource limitations, both in terms of funding and workforce capacity, emerged as a critical barrier. Many practitioners found it difficult to consistently apply SBA principles in the face of high workloads and limited time for in-depth assessments. Additionally, existing financial and commissioning systems often conflicted with the ethos of SBAs, requiring practitioners to adapt or compromise their approaches to meet organizational requirements. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated these issues, highlighting the fragility of community resources and the increasing demands on social care services.

A key area of concern is the potential for SBAs to inadvertently place undue responsibility on individuals, particularly in cases where systemic or structural barriers limit their capacity to act on their strengths. For instance, emphasizing personal resilience without addressing broader social inequalities risks alienating or further marginalizing vulnerable individuals. Practitioners also noted that not all service users were receptive to the SBA ethos, with some preferring more traditional, directive forms of support. These challenges highlight the need for a nuanced application of SBAs, balancing individual empowerment with systemic support and structural change.

Looking ahead, the future of SBAs in social work depends on addressing these challenges and building a stronger evidence base for their effectiveness. While qualitative data from practitioners underscores the transformative potential of SBAs, robust quantitative evaluations are needed to capture their full impact. Engaging directly with service users and their carers will also be crucial in understanding how these approaches intersect with lived experiences and contribute to long-term well-being. Policymakers must ensure that sufficient resources and systemic support are available to sustain the adoption of SBAs, recognizing their potential to reshape social work practice and improve outcomes for all stakeholders.

Source

Understanding and Treating ADHD

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is one of the most prevalent neurodevelopmental disorders in children and adolescents. Characterized by persistent symptoms of inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity that do not align with a child’s developmental stage, ADHD can significantly impact academic performance, social relationships, family dynamics, and self-esteem. The early detection and treatment of ADHD are vital to ensuring a child’s successful development and functioning across these various domains.

ADHD typically emerges in early childhood and persists for at least six months. While symptoms often extend into adolescence and adulthood, the disorder must be observed in two or more settings—such as school and home—to confirm a diagnosis. Studies suggest that ADHD has a strong genetic component, with environmental influences playing a contributing role. Neuroimaging and neuropsychological research have linked the condition to dysfunctions in the prefrontal cortex, basal ganglia, and cerebellum—areas of the brain involved in executive functions, working memory, and temporal processing.

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) classifies ADHD into three main presentations: combined (both inattentive and hyperactive-impulsive symptoms), predominantly inattentive, and predominantly hyperactive-impulsive. Each of these requires a specific symptom threshold: at least six symptoms for children and five for individuals aged 17 and older. Symptoms must be chronic and not better explained by other conditions such as oppositional defiant disorder or intellectual difficulties.

To assist in diagnosis, a symptom recording format has been suggested to capture specific behaviors and their consequences across various environments. The severity of ADHD is classified as mild, moderate, or severe based on symptom number and the extent of functional impairment.

A thorough evaluation for ADHD includes a detailed clinical history covering medical, psychiatric, academic, and family backgrounds. Both direct and indirect observations of the child’s behavior in multiple settings are essential, often involving questionnaires and structured interviews with parents and teachers. Physical examinations help rule out other medical causes, such as vision or hearing problems, anemia, or thyroid dysfunction. Intelligence testing can help differentiate ADHD from intellectual disabilities, while neuropsychological assessments provide insight into executive functioning, attention, and memory. Additional tools such as EEG, MRI, or genetic testing may be employed to rule out epilepsy or brain abnormalities. Emotional assessments are also critical to identify anxiety or depression that may mimic or coexist with ADHD symptoms.

Given the symptomatic overlap with other disorders, differential diagnosis is essential. Generalized anxiety disorder, for example, involves persistent worries and physiological symptoms, while depressive disorders manifest primarily through mood disturbances and low energy. Bipolar disorder includes mood swings and grandiosity, which differ from the impulsivity seen in ADHD. Specific learning disorders, conduct disorder, and oppositional defiant disorder also require careful differentiation. Notably, ADHD can co-occur with these conditions, necessitating a nuanced diagnostic approach.

Once a diagnosis is confirmed, psychoeducation is often the first step in treatment. This involves educating the child and their family about ADHD, including its causes, symptoms, possible comorbidities, treatment options, and long-term outcomes. Psychoeducation dispels myths and builds a foundation of understanding and collaboration between families and healthcare providers, guiding them toward appropriate resources and professionals.

Behavioral therapy is another central component of treatment. For children, the goal is to enhance social skills such as self-control, patience, emotional regulation, and effective communication. Positive behaviors are reinforced through praise and rewards, while disruptive behaviors are managed using techniques like time-out or overcorrection. For parents, behavioral training helps them establish consistent boundaries, structured routines, and empathetic support strategies that promote better home environments and reduce stress.

Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) focuses on enhancing self-regulation and problem-solving skills by teaching children to use internal speech and self-instructions. Through a progressive process, children learn to guide themselves through tasks by first hearing instructions from an adult, then repeating them aloud, and eventually internalizing them. CBT can help children plan, set goals, and manage impulses more effectively.

Cognitive rehabilitation, meanwhile, addresses specific deficits in attention, memory, and other cognitive functions. This therapeutic approach aims to improve the child’s overall cognitive performance and can be tailored to individual needs.

Pharmacological treatment is generally considered when symptoms are severe or when non-pharmacological approaches prove insufficient. The choice to use medication depends on factors such as symptom intensity, age, presence of comorbid conditions, previous treatment responses, and the child’s adherence to therapy. Medications are broadly categorized into stimulants and non-stimulants. Stimulants, like methylphenidate, act on dopamine pathways and are available in various formulations. Non-stimulants, such as atomoxetine and guanfacine, target noradrenaline metabolism and are often used when stimulant medications are contraindicated. It is generally recommended to combine pharmacological treatment with behavioral and psychological therapies to ensure a more comprehensive approach to managing ADHD.

In conclusion, ADHD is a complex, multifaceted disorder requiring a careful and comprehensive approach to diagnosis and treatment. Understanding its presentations, underlying neurological basis, and symptomatology is crucial for early intervention and effective management. Collaboration among healthcare providers, educators, and families plays a key role in creating supportive environments where children with ADHD can thrive. Importantly, a diagnosis of ADHD should not be seen as a limitation but rather as a foundation for tailored support that nurtures a child’s strengths and potential.

Source

NHS: ADHD in children and young people

The Hidden Link: How Problematic Social Media Use and Social Stress Drive Cyber-Victimization in Adolescents

In today’s digital world, social media use among adolescents is almost universal, but its darker implications are still unfolding. A recent study titled “Problematic Social Media Use and Conflict, Social Stress, and Cyber-Victimization Among Early Adolescents” by Shongha Kim, Rachel Garthe, Wan-Jung Hsieh, and Jun Sung Hong explores the complex relationship between problematic social media behavior and the rising tide of cyber-victimization among youth. Drawing on the Social Information Processing (SIP) model, the research focuses on how social stress mediates the link between problematic use and cyberbullying, providing timely insight into a pervasive and increasingly harmful issue.

The study targets early adolescents, particularly sixth graders, during a formative period in their development when they are gaining autonomy, navigating changing peer dynamics, and interacting more through digital platforms. While previous studies have shown that the amount of time spent on social media correlates with increased risk of cyber-victimization, Kim and her colleagues shift the lens from frequency of use to the quality and nature of social media engagement. Specifically, they examine Problematic Social Media Use and Conflict (PSMUC)—a term that encompasses negative behaviors and outcomes stemming from excessive preoccupation with social media, such as arguments with family and friends, school troubles, and lost relationships.

This shift in focus is critical. Time alone does not tell the full story of adolescents’ online behavior. The conflicts and emotional turbulence generated by problematic usage offer a more nuanced explanation for why some adolescents are more vulnerable to cyber-victimization than others. The research demonstrates that adolescents caught in cycles of social media-related conflict may experience elevated levels of social stress—feelings of exclusion, loneliness, and isolation—which in turn makes them more likely to be targeted online.

The researchers collected data from 316 sixth-grade students at a large public middle school in the Midwestern United States. The students were diverse in terms of race, ethnicity, and economic background. Using structural equation modeling, the study tested three main hypotheses: whether certain demographic groups reported higher rates of cyber-victimization and PSMUC; whether higher levels of PSMUC were linked to increased social stress and cyber-victimization; and whether social stress mediated the relationship between PSMUC and cyber-victimization.

The findings were illuminating. Roughly 29% of the students reported experiencing some form of cyber-victimization from someone at school. PSMUC was significantly associated with both increased social stress and cyber-victimization. Furthermore, the researchers confirmed a mediating effect: adolescents with higher PSMUC were more likely to report feelings of social stress, which in turn increased their risk of being cyberbullied. This indirect pathway underlines the central premise of the SIP model—that emotional and cognitive responses to social conflicts can alter how youth perceive and react to future social interactions, potentially setting them up for victimization.

The study also uncovered notable demographic trends. White students reported higher levels of social stress, while non-White students showed higher PSMUC levels. Those receiving free or reduced-price lunch (a marker of economic disadvantage) were more likely to report both cyber-victimization and problematic social media behavior. Interestingly, gender and ethnicity did not yield significant differences in mean-level analyses, though in the structural model, male students were less likely to report cyber-victimization.

These findings carry substantial implications for schools, mental health professionals, and families. First, they challenge the notion that simply limiting screen time is enough to prevent online harm. Instead, they suggest that the quality of online interactions and the conflicts that stem from social media use deserve greater scrutiny. The findings also urge school social workers, counselors, and psychologists to pay closer attention to social stress as a red flag for deeper problems. By identifying students struggling with PSMUC and intervening early, professionals can potentially disrupt the chain of events leading to cyber-victimization.

Moreover, the study critiques the idea of restricting social media as a blanket solution. Rather than policing digital behavior, schools and families should focus on empowering adolescents. Teaching them about privacy settings, conflict resolution, and healthy communication online could be more effective strategies. Interventions should not only address behavior but also the emotional landscape that underlies it. For instance, programs that build emotional resilience, peer support, and inclusive school climates may reduce the feelings of isolation that make young people targets.

Family involvement is another critical point raised by the authors. Since many conflicts originate at home—arguments over device use, strained parent-child communication—supporting parents in setting healthy boundaries and engaging in open conversations with their children about social media may be a key part of prevention. Encouraging shared understanding rather than punishment could defuse tensions and foster healthier relationships.

Of course, the study is not without limitations. It is based on self-reported data from a single middle school in a semi-urban area, which may limit the generalizability of its findings. Additionally, the cross-sectional design does not allow for conclusions about causality or changes over time. Future research would benefit from longitudinal designs that follow students over several years, allowing researchers to see how problematic behavior, social stress, and victimization evolve together.

Despite these limitations, the study offers a compelling argument that understanding adolescent cyber-victimization requires a shift in perspective. It’s not just about time spent online, but the interpersonal conflicts and psychological distress that often accompany problematic usage. By addressing the emotional fallout of PSMUC—particularly the social stress that can leave adolescents isolated and vulnerable—educators, clinicians, and parents can work together to create a safer, more supportive digital environment for youth.

The research by Kim and her colleagues provides a vital roadmap for future prevention efforts. It reinforces the importance of viewing adolescent digital behavior through a relational and emotional lens. Addressing the deeper issues of social stress and problematic usage patterns may be the key to stemming the tide of cyber-victimization, ultimately promoting healthier, more connected youth both online and offline.

Source

Understanding Adolescent Health in the Social Work Perspective

Understanding adolescent health from a social work perspective requires a multidimensional appreciation of the complex and dynamic changes occurring during adolescence, as well as the systemic factors that influence these changes. Adolescents, typically defined as individuals between the ages of 10 and 19, undergo significant physical, emotional, psychological, and social transformations that shape their development and identity. Social workers engaging with adolescents must be equipped to recognize these transitions and respond holistically to the needs that arise during this critical period.

The adolescent stage is marked by biological changes such as puberty, which initiate physical growth spurts and the development of secondary sexual characteristics. Alongside these bodily changes, adolescents experience cognitive and emotional growth, characterized by increased abstract thinking, self-awareness, and the formation of identity. These developmental changes bring about a need for autonomy and a desire for peer acceptance, often leading to conflicts with parental authority and experimentation with new behaviors and roles. Social workers must therefore understand adolescence not as a problem to be managed, but as a normal and essential developmental stage that, while challenging, presents opportunities for growth and resilience.

Stages of Adolescent Development

Adolescence is commonly divided into three distinct stages: early adolescence (10–13 years), middle adolescence (14–16 years), and late adolescence (17–19 years). Each stage presents specific developmental tasks and challenges. In early adolescence, individuals experience the onset of puberty, resulting in rapid physical growth and hormonal changes. This stage is often marked by increased self-consciousness, heightened sensitivity to peer influence, and an emerging sense of identity. During middle adolescence, cognitive development advances, allowing for more complex reasoning, abstract thinking, and questioning of authority. Emotional intensity peaks, and adolescents often strive for greater independence from parental control while seeking approval from peers. By late adolescence, individuals typically gain greater emotional stability, clearer identity formation, and improved decision-making abilities. This period also involves preparation for adult roles, including vocational planning and the establishment of intimate relationships. Social workers must tailor their approaches according to the developmental needs and cognitive maturity of adolescents in each stage, ensuring interventions are age-appropriate and supportive of healthy growth.

In understanding adolescent health, it is essential to contextualize it within broader determinants. The family, school, peer group, media, and community each play a critical role in shaping an adolescent’s behavior and health outcomes. For instance, family structures and parenting styles can have profound effects on adolescents’ emotional well-being and behavior. Supportive family environments tend to encourage healthy development, while families experiencing conflict, neglect, or abuse can contribute to poor outcomes such as substance abuse, depression, or delinquent behavior. Similarly, the school environment can either support or hinder adolescents’ development. Schools that foster inclusivity, participation, and a sense of belonging can act as protective factors, whereas those marked by bullying, academic pressure, or neglect may exacerbate vulnerabilities.

Peers also become increasingly influential during adolescence. Peer groups offer adolescents the opportunity to form social identities and practice autonomy. While positive peer influence can promote healthy behaviors and reinforce social norms, negative peer influence may lead to risk-taking behaviors such as smoking, drinking, or unprotected sex. Media and technology, especially social media, also significantly impact adolescents’ mental and emotional health. The constant exposure to idealized lifestyles, peer comparison, and online bullying can increase stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. Social workers must therefore consider these social determinants in their interventions and work collaboratively with families, schools, and communities to promote adolescent health.

One of the significant areas of concern in adolescent health is mental health. Adolescents are particularly vulnerable to mental health issues such as anxiety, depression, and self-harm, often exacerbated by academic pressure, social isolation, or identity crises. Mental health challenges in adolescence frequently go unrecognized or untreated due to stigma, lack of awareness, or limited access to mental health services. Social workers play a critical role in early identification, prevention, and intervention by providing counseling, advocating for supportive school environments, and linking adolescents with appropriate mental health services. Building trusting relationships with adolescents is essential, as it encourages openness and helps in addressing underlying issues in a nonjudgmental manner.

Another central issue is reproductive and sexual health. Adolescents often lack accurate knowledge about sexual and reproductive health, resulting in early pregnancies, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and unsafe abortions. Inadequate sex education and cultural taboos further contribute to misinformation and risky behaviors. Social workers can provide adolescents with age-appropriate, culturally sensitive education that empowers them to make informed decisions about their bodies and relationships. Promoting open communication about sexuality, ensuring access to contraceptives, and addressing gender-based violence are key strategies to improve adolescent reproductive health.

Substance use is another prevalent concern during adolescence. The desire for experimentation, peer influence, and coping with stress or trauma can lead adolescents to use tobacco, alcohol, or drugs. Early initiation of substance use is associated with long-term health problems and social consequences. Social workers must adopt a preventive approach that involves raising awareness about the risks of substance use, building adolescents’ coping skills, and supporting families in creating protective environments. For adolescents already engaging in substance use, harm reduction strategies and rehabilitation services must be made accessible and non-punitive.

Nutrition and physical health also play a crucial role in adolescent development. Adolescents have increased nutritional needs due to rapid growth, but they often adopt poor dietary habits influenced by peer norms, media, and lifestyle changes. Malnutrition—both undernutrition and obesity—can have lasting impacts on health, affecting physical development, academic performance, and self-esteem. Encouraging healthy eating habits, regular physical activity, and body positivity is vital. Social workers can contribute by organizing community-based health programs, advocating for adolescent-friendly health services, and engaging with schools to ensure balanced nutrition and physical education.

From a social work perspective, promoting adolescent health requires a rights-based, strengths-focused approach. Adolescents are not merely passive recipients of care; they are active agents in their development. Social workers must empower adolescents to voice their concerns, participate in decisions affecting them, and access opportunities that nurture their potential. This includes advocating for adolescent-friendly policies, improving access to education and health care, and addressing systemic inequalities that marginalize certain groups of adolescents, such as those with disabilities, LGBTQ+ youth, or those in conflict with the law.

Cultural sensitivity and ethical practice are fundamental to effective social work with adolescents. Interventions must respect adolescents’ dignity, privacy, and autonomy while recognizing the role of cultural norms and values in shaping behaviors. At the same time, social workers must challenge harmful practices such as child marriage, female genital mutilation, or honor-based violence. Balancing cultural competence with advocacy for adolescent rights is a delicate but essential task.

In conclusion, understanding adolescent health through a social work lens entails a comprehensive appreciation of developmental, psychological, social, and systemic factors that influence health outcomes. Social workers must adopt a holistic, preventive, and participatory approach that addresses the unique challenges adolescents face while fostering resilience and empowerment. By working in partnership with families, schools, communities, and policy-makers, social workers can contribute significantly to the promotion of adolescent health and well-being, ensuring that this critical phase of life becomes a foundation for a healthy and productive adulthood.

Source

The Hidden Cost of Suppressed Emotions

In a world where modern medicine often focuses on treating symptoms with pills and procedures, Dr. Gabor Maté, a renowned Canadian physician and psychotherapist, offers a radically different perspective. In his international bestseller When the Body Says No: The Cost of Hidden Stress, Maté argues that the root cause of many chronic illnesses—such as cancer, addiction, and depression—lies not in genetics or biology alone, but in suppressed emotions and unhealed trauma. Drawing from decades of clinical experience and scientific studies, Maté’s work challenges the conventional separation of mind and body in Western medicine, urging us to address the emotional wounds that silently shape our health.

1. The Mind-Body Connection: Chronic Illness Starts with Emotional Repression

Maté asserts that the roots of most chronic illnesses are psychological and emotional, a perspective that starkly contrasts with mainstream medical practice. He points out a troubling statistic: 70% of adults in the United States are on medication, yet chronic diseases, obesity, addiction, and mental illness continue to rise. Why are we struggling despite advancements in science? Maté argues that modern medicine’s fatal flaw is its failure to integrate the mind and body. “The repression of anger leads to the chronic secretion of stress hormones, such as cortisol, that suppress the immune system,” Maté explains, citing research from his website (drgabormate.com). This suppression, he notes, has been linked to a wide range of conditions, from cancer and rheumatoid arthritis to migraines and fibromyalgia.

In his over two decades of family medicine, including seven years in palliative care, Maté observed a consistent pattern: patients with chronic illnesses often exhibited emotional shutdowns, particularly an inability to express anger. They were driven by a compulsive sense of responsibility for others, often at the expense of their own needs, and struggled to say “no.” This emotional repression, Maté argues, creates a physiological environment ripe for disease, a theory supported by studies showing that individuals who suppress emotions are at a 30% higher risk of developing depressive symptoms (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003).

2. Trauma Begins in the Womb: The Lasting Impact of Early Stress

One of Maté’s most profound insights is that trauma can begin even before birth. He explains that a stressed mother’s emotional state directly affects the fetus, shaping its brain development and physiology. “A stressed mother affects the physiology and brain development of the fetus,” Maté notes. “The impacts of that stress can be seen decades later by how they respond to stress as adults.” In Western societies, where many pregnant women work well into late pregnancy, this stress can imprint on the baby, influencing its future mental and emotional health.

Maté’s own life story as the Budapest-born son of Holocaust survivors underscores this point. As an infant, his mother left him in the care of strangers for weeks to save his life during the Holocaust, an experience he believes left him with lifelong themes of abandonment, loss, and rage (theconversation.com, 2025). This early trauma, he argues, is not an isolated case but a universal phenomenon that shapes who we become, often manifesting as chronic illness or mental health struggles later in life.

3. Addiction as a Coping Mechanism: Reframing the Problem

Maté’s perspective on addiction is both compassionate and revolutionary. “Addiction isn’t the problem, it’s the solution,” he states. He views addiction—whether to substances, behaviors, or even work—as a coping mechanism for unhealed emotional trauma. “We turn to substances or behaviors to soothe wounds,” Maté explains, a theory backed by a study in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, which found that 70% of individuals in drug treatment programs report having experienced trauma.

Rather than asking “Why the addiction?” Maté urges us to ask “Why the pain?” This shift in perspective encourages self-compassion and a deeper understanding of the emotional wounds driving addictive behaviors. For Maté, healing addiction requires addressing these underlying emotions, a process that goes beyond the surface-level interventions of most treatment programs. His own struggles with addiction and ADHD, which he has openly discussed, lend a personal authenticity to his approach, making his insights resonate with those who feel misunderstood by traditional medical frameworks.

4. Depression and the Weight of Suppressed Emotions

Maté challenges the conventional view of depression as a chemical imbalance, such as low serotonin levels. Instead, he identifies suppressed emotions as the true root cause. “When you bury your pain, sadness, or anger, it doesn’t disappear,” he warns in the thread. “It lives in your body, silently shaping your thoughts.” This emotional repression leads to feelings of hopelessness, emptiness, and depression, a connection supported by the 2003 study mentioned earlier, which linked emotional suppression to a higher risk of depressive symptoms.

Healing, according to Maté, requires reconnecting with these buried emotions and feeling them without judgment. This process can be daunting, as it involves confronting pain that has been avoided for years, if not decades. However, Maté emphasizes that this emotional reconnection is essential for recovery, offering a path to liberation from the cycle of depression.

5. People-Pleasing as a Sign of Deeper Wounds

At first glance, people-pleasing might seem like a harmless trait, but Maté sees it as a symptom of deeper emotional wounds, often rooted in childhood. “Those raised in emotionally unstable environments learn to prioritize others’ needs before their own as a survival tactic,” he explains. This behavior, while adaptive in childhood, leads to a loss of connection with one’s own needs in adulthood, perpetuating a cycle of emotional suppression.

To break free, Maté recommends a three-step process: learning to identify your own needs, setting healthy boundaries, and reclaiming your sense of self. This journey requires processing suppressed emotions, which can be facilitated through therapeutic methods like Internal Family Systems, Somatic Experiencing, EMDR, Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy, and Maté’s own approach, Compassionate Inquiry. These methods, he notes, help individuals reconnect with their bodies and emotions, paving the way for true healing.

A Path to Healing: Reconnecting with the Body

Maté’s work is a powerful reminder that healing is not just about treating the body—it’s about addressing the mind and emotions as well. His insights challenge us to look beyond the surface of our struggles and confront the emotional wounds that shape our health. Fortunately, as Maté points out, healing is more accessible than ever before. The first step, he suggests, is free: reconnecting with your body and sensations. From there, therapeutic methods can provide the tools to process suppressed emotions and reclaim your well-being.

For those feeling stuck, Maté’s message is one of hope. Various resources available that can help individuals change their habits, routines, and mindset, fostering strength and discipline. Maté’s work, combined with such tools, offers a roadmap to break free from the hidden costs of suppressed emotions and live a healthier, more authentic life.

Conclusion: A Call to Emotional Awarenes

Gabor Maté’s insights into the mind-body connection are a wake-up call for a society grappling with rising rates of chronic illness and mental health struggles. By linking conditions like cancer, addiction, and depression to suppressed emotions and unhealed trauma, Maté challenges us to rethink our approach to health. His five key insights—ranging from the psychological roots of illness to the origins of people-pleasing—reveal the profound impact of emotional repression on our lives. But more importantly, they offer a path forward: by reconnecting with our emotions, setting boundaries, and seeking therapeutic support, we can break free from the cycles of pain that hold us back. In a world that often prioritizes quick fixes, Maté’s work reminds us that true healing begins with listening to what the body—and the heart—have to say.